The Government’s War on Fake News is a War on You

They are laying it on pretty thick.  In the wake of Donald Trump’s unlikely Presidential victory, the opposing party is pulling out all the stops to try to discredit his election win and explain it away.  Now, Common Sense Conspiracy is not a political site, and we have frequently explained our one-party two-party system theory about the American government.  However, in a case like this, it’s important for our readers to realize that while it looks like partisan politics playing out in a high stakes game, the loser and target is always you and I.  This situation is no exception.

The new battle cry against fake news seems like a turning point.  We all see the conservative and liberal versions of extremist news sources on our social media feeds and in our email.  It’s true that both sides are “liberal” with the facts, and in many cases, it is just spreading incorrect propaganda to forward an agenda.  However, when President Obama and company say they are going after “fake news” that is not what they mean.  Fake news to them is anything that directly takes on their narrative.  Fake news, according to the likes of Obama and Hillary Clinton, would be sites like this one.  Any site that doesn’t go along with their absurd official story and tries to inject facts into the equation will qualify as fake news in a heartbeat.

That’s what is so sinister about what they are doing here.  It’s calculated.  It may seem like it’s about Trump, or just sour grapes from sore losers of a hotly contested election.  But it’s just the beginning.  They will start by targeting the extreme news sources we referenced earlier, but soon, they will expand it out to include sites like this and any other site out there that is presenting a fact-based approach to their disinformation campaigns.

You have to look at what the other hand is doing.  It’s like a sleight-of-hand trick they are playing right in your face.  They make you think one thing, and it is a reasonable one that makes a lot of sense.  Meanwhile, the other hand is up to something much more sinister.  The only thing you can always count on in their schemes is that the loser is always going to be you.

Fake news is bad.  But the biggest proponent of fake news in America is the mainstream media.  That alone should prove that their intentions are less than honorable.

Is the Assassination of Russian Ambassador to Turkey This Generation’s Archduke Ferdinand Moment?

Today, the Russian ambassador to Turkey, Andrei Karlov, was sinisterly assassinated in a very public way.  The gunman, now killed by police, left absolutely no doubt as to what his motivation for the killing was.  Could this be the moment that so many in conspiracy circles have waited for, hoping against hope that it would never come?

The climate between Turkey and Russia wasn’t all that great.  There is much turmoil over there gigantic, gaping disagreement about what is happening with Syria.  While their relationship had warmed slightly in recent months, overall it’s not a very friendly one, so it is obvious that world events dictate that a seemingly small event could set off a set of dominoes leading to a World War 3 situation.  Don’t think so?  Time for a history lesson.

Archduke Ferdinand is the guy that got assassinated and it literally set the entire world into the first World War.  He was the Archduke in Austria.  Flashing forward to our time, it is hard to believe how that could start an international conflict that would claim millions of lives.  But just look at Syria and the Middle East.  Look at ISIS and the power vacuum.  Look at Russia’s increasing aggressiveness in the last couple of years.  And look at the arrival of a President Donald Trump on the scene in a few weeks.  If ever there was the possibility of this generation having a Ferdinand moment, this certainly seems like it could be it.

On the naysayer side, there will be those that say the world has changed since 1914, and something like this isn’t enough to start this kind of explosion that almost guarantees a mutually-assured self destruction conflict.  Yet, those same people would have told you the same back then when the world declared that World War 1 was the “war to end all wars” and it would never happen on that scale again.  It wouldn’t even take that long for it to happen again.  They couldn’t have been more wrong.

Anyone that knows anything will tell you that a World War 3 scenario is inevitable.  We all just hope that it is many years from now, but it would be foolish to think that it cannot or will not happen again.

Having said all of that, Common Sense Conspiracy wants to remind our readers that events like this happen from time to time, and more often than not, they do not spark international conflicts.  It is perfectly possible that Russia and Turkey realize this is an isolated conflict and don’t let it turn into an arms race of epic proportions.  But Vladimir Putin is not known for that sort of standoffish behavior.  It may very well depend a lot on how Turkey reacts, and whether their reaction satisfies Putin to the point that he doesn’t push the issue.  Also, there is also the wild card of what an incoming President Trump might say or do in such an incendiary situation.  It’s a crazy time to be alive , people.

What do you think?  Is this the shot that will be heard and felt around the world?  Or just an unfortunate incident that civilized nations will work around?

Hillary and Putin Have Beef — Are We Going to War With Russia for Democrats to Save Face?

Hillary Clinton could have done a lot of things to make her so-called love for the country front and center in the weeks since her unexpected loss to Donald Trump in the election.  She could have calmed the divide in America by rejecting the protests in the wake of her loss.  She could have discouraged civil unrest by speaking out and telling those trying to hijack the Electoral College that it’s time to unify under one American banner and accept defeat.  She did neither.  And after a period of silence, she is back out in the open doing what her and President Obama’s administration were tasked with by the New World Order to come:  work overtime to make sure America is as divided as ever.

Many, many Democrats revolve their whole schtick around their supposed anti-war sentiments.  Well, with the hacking allegations regarding Russia, it is looking ever more likely that America and Russia are headed for a showdown.  But wait a minute!  How can that be when Putin got exactly what he supposedly wanted?  After all, the word on the street (and from multiple United States’ intelligence agencies) is that Russia pulled out all the stops to make sure Donald Trump would be the next President of the United States.

Hillary now says that the reason Putin got Trump elected (because clearly that is what happened in all ways you may consider it) was because of “beef” they had that dates back to when she was Secretary of State.  According to Hillary, she herself caused major unrest in Russia and caused Putin’s own people to question his judgment.  Of course, no one remembers any of that happening in the real world, but that has never mattered if you are a Clinton.  So, an angry Putin decided to set loose his hackers on the DNC and dismantle democracy.

President Obama is pushing this hard.  Hillary Clinton is now pushing this hard.  Donald Trump says it’s all lies.  Who is right?  Who is telling the truth?  Are we about to be plunged into World War 3 with Russia all because the Democratic Party can’t accept that anything less than a massive international conspiracy could have derailed their 3rd straight stranglehold on the White House?  And aren’t they the first and foremost criticizers of conspiracy theorists everywhere?  Now, they are proposing perhaps the greatest conspiracy theory of all time to override the possibility that maybe their agenda has lost touch with the people that it is supposed to represent?

Assuming an Electoral College history-making event, Donald Trump will assume the Presidency in a few short weeks.  Perhaps this will calm down this sudden firestorm.  After all, we have President Obama, the king of doing nothing at all in the face of danger, promising “retaliation” against Russia for interfering with the American election.  Would he be as fired up if Hillary had won in a landslide?

Probably not.

Alan Thicke Dead at 69 — Any Illuminati Connections?

It’s inevitable anytime a well-known celebrity figure passes away suddenly and unexpectedly. We get the emails here at Common Sense Conspiracy wondering if this could have some Illuminati connection. Sometimes it’s a little on the silly side, and other times it made a heck of a lot of sense. This is one of those that appears crazy at first glance, but if you look into it a little further, you can at least acknowledge where people get the idea from.

While it may be a stretch to think that Alan Thicke was involved with the Illuminati, many believe his son Robin is quite another story.

There is little reason to think Alan Thicke is or was a member of the Illuminati. While a successful actor and television personality for sure, he is not on the level of celebrity status that typically introduces Illuminati involvement into the equation. But a lot of our readers will quickly point out that you don’t have to be intimately involved with the Illuminati to be a victim, and this is certainly a true statement. Many are wondering if Alan Thicke’s son Robin (who has been connected to the Illuminati on more than one occasion) could have been the reason for this. Could Robin’s beloved father have been an Illuminati blood sacrifice for Robin Thicke, the controversial “Blurred Lines” singer. Remember that video. It only had a goat dancing around. No big deal, right?

Alan Thicke really loved hockey, and according to the official story, suffered a heart attack playing the game. It is a little bit of an unusual story. A 69-year-old man playing hockey is not exactly common, but possible, sure. And if a 69-year-old man was playing hockey aggressively and his heart wasn’t in the best of shape to begin with, it’s plausible that this could be a perfectly natural death. We at Common Sense Conspiracy believe that the official story on this one is far and away the most likely solution. But given Robin’s connections in the past, not to mention his meteoric rise to fame out of seemingly nowhere a couple of summers ago, it is not totally nuts to at least raise the question. The video below goes right past our analysis for the lightning round of Illuminati blood sacrifices. It really gets extra points for the professional way it is presented, also. What do you think?

The Obamas That Stole Christmas: A Little Fact-Checking About the White House Christmas Tree

One of the Laura Bush trees in 2005 was decorated entirely with white lilies.

Be it on Facebook, Twitter, or in your personal email, it’s hard for anyone to have not run across what we at Common Sense Conspiracy are now labeling the “Holiday Tree Scam.”  Unlike most scams out there, this is not trying to get your money or personal information.  It is simply trying to spread disinformation.  Let’s start by saying that the CSC certainly believes that personal liberties are being taken away from us one-by-one.  We have extensively covered information regarding the New World Order and we are never going to be accused by anyone of being Obama’s biggest fans.  However, we also believe in a mantra around here that those that read regularly know so well:  sometimes it is what it is.

If you haven’t seen the “Holiday Tree Scam” in action, it goes like this in a quick summary.  The White House has announced that they will not have a Christmas tree this year, but a Holiday tree.  People in America should refer to their own personal trees as Holiday Trees as well.  This is supposedly because of the religious and ethnic differences in our nation.  The idea is that the Christmas tree at the White House signifies that we are a Christian country (what a terrible concept) and it is offensive to people of other religious backgrounds.  It also goes along with an encouragement to not say “Merry Christmas” but “Happy Holidays.”  The scam’s goal is simply to spark outrage.  People get upset when things like this circulate.  They believe it is true because it sounds halfway legitimate with what is going on in our world day-to-day anyway.  It’s not that hard to believe, but here at Common Sense, we do believe in checking facts, and the facts in this case are seriously skewed.   First, here’s an example of what you might see floating around on Facebook:

WHAT A CROCK OF BULL….. We can’t say Merry Christmas now we have to say Happy Holidays. We can’t call it a Christmas tree, it’s now called a Holiday tree? Because it might offend someone. If you don’t like our “Customs” and it offends you so much then GO HOME. I will help you pack. They are called customs and we have our traditions If you… agree with this…please post this as your status!! I AM A PROUD AMERCIAN CITIZEN… MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! Do you have what it takes to repost this?

Never mind that the people propagating this list cannot spell “American” which in my opinion is the real crime here.  If you are interested in reading the email that is circulating, a full version of it can be found here.  Ok, so now you have the phony info.  Let’s get on to the real facts.

A lot of the backlash surrounding this scam comes from the idea that a fair sampling of the nation believes that Obama is a Muslim.  Now, whether that is true or not is a debate for another day (and one we will gladly take on in another article), but for our purposes here, the fact that there has been some outcry about Obama’s religious background is part of the reason that the idea that he would outlaw the Christmas tree at the White House is so easy for people to accept.  Ironically, a little fact-checking turns up some very interesting information.  How many people posting and circulating this scam would believe me if I said that First Lady Laura Bush, the wife of George W. Bush, famously refused to include Christ-centered ornaments or themes on the White House Christmas tree.  Actually, when Michelle Obama received the Christmas tree at the White House for the first time in 2009, she immediately did away with Laura Bush’s “themed” ornaments and had over 800 new, traditional ornaments created just for the occasion.  Now, this is not an attempt to say that Laura Bush was trying to ban Christmas; more likely she just had a different taste that didn’t necessarily coincide with traditional American ideas of what a Christmas tree should look like.  It is funny how many people don’t know this and are so quick to condemn the Obama’s for stealing Christmas.

So, at the very least, the Christmas tree is not called a Christmas tree at the White House, right?  Hmm…

27 seconds in. What’s that?

Happy holidays from Common Sense Conspiracy. Or is it Merry Christmas? We can’t tell you.
 

The Irony of the Government’s Russian Hacking Probe — Mad Cause You Did It Better Than Us?

The CIA and other government agencies are indicating that Russia was involved in some sort of cyberwarefare activities to influence the United States’ Presidential election last month. As a matter of fact, they have been saying that for a while. It just didn’t matter that much until Donald Trump shocked the world by defeating Hillary Clinton in the Electoral College. Now, it’s a big deal.
Let’s put this in perspective for a minute though. The government is accusing Russia of using hacking as a means to influence the outcome of the United States’ election, the same election that Russia hacked emails from the Democratic National Convention and then gave them to WikiLeaks who in turn released them to the public revealing that the United States had fixed the Democratic Primary. Get that?
It’s now common, factual knowledge that Bernie Sanders was never in the running for the Hillary Clinton’s spot as the Democratic nominee. The fix was in. He made a good showing publicly, but he never had any chance. They made sure of it. And the same powers were at work in the general election. The government is angry because it appears that Russia was better at fixing the general election than they were. Now they have an outsider in the Presidency. Bummer for the elites.
Another big question is why Russia would want Trump to be President in the first place? The emails that they hacked are great material to control a Hillary Clinton as President. What could possibly be the rationale for Putin and the Russian government wanting a hothead like Trump as their primary competition amongst world superpowers? It seems much more likely that Russia was preparing for a Hillary Clinton presidency, and now the hacking is just being used as a means for the government to explain how an outsider could have infiltrated their elite system.
Of course, this theory all hinges on the idea that you truly believe that Donald Trump is an outsider that has used the Republican Party as a gateway to the Presidency. What do you think? Is Trump in league with Russia? Was this all part of an elaborate plot to deny Hillary Clinton her lifetime achievement award? Are there more sinister intentions of the Trump/Russia partnership? Or is this all an attempt to undermine Trump’s unexpected, shocking win by questioning its legitimacy and convincing the American people that the election’s outcome was influenced by an old enemy?

After all, there’s just no way that Trump could have just won without some help, right?

CNN Actively Promotes Americans Wearing Hijabs to Make Muslims Feel More Comfortable

Never mind the fact that a Muslim refugee just wreaked havoc at Ohio State University in a terrorist attack that really urinates in the Democratic Party’s Cheerios. The real news is that CNN is actively promoting the concept that Americans, regardless of their religious sensibilities, should show their Muslim friends there is nothing to be afraid of by donning hijabs. Sharia law anyone?

We filter through the BS so you don't have to!