Huh? That’s what you’re saying right now in response to that title you just read for this article. Power move? Are you a Democrat? Republican? Independent? No matter. That’s what makes it so amazing. It doesn’t matter what you are. It still worked.
Republicans were angry with Comey because he didn’t push for criminal charges on Hillary Clinton in her email server scandal that plagued her throughout the election. Then Trump won and they weren’t so angry anymore. Meanwhile, Democrats were angry with Comey because they felt his actions leading up to the election caused them to lose it. Now, Trump has fired Comey, and neither party can decide what they are supposed to think.
A power move. Yes, the ultimate. This is the greatest prize for our one-party, two-party political system. They have managed to make people on both sides of the fence they created only to make you think you have a choice angry over the exact same thing and same set of circumstances. That’s incredible, and if you leave out extremely effective false-flag operations, this could be the most effective government power move of all time.
Stoking division with one move. Two birds with one stone. Making sure everyone is watching the one hand while the other one is moving, quickly.
So, whatever side of this political equation you might fall on, make sure you take a second to see the big picture. Man, that was incredibly devious wasn’t it? See what they did there?
There is currently a battle going on in the American government about health care. As you probably recall, President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, often known by its affectionate nickname “ObamaCare”, has been the source of major controversy in the United States for, well, nearly a decade. Most of this revolves around the idea of a penalty for not signing up for health care and the inflated premiums and deductibles that came as a result of the ObamaCare system. Now, new President Trump has made it a top priority to get rid of ObamaCare as quickly as possible, but the problem with that is the new potential plan is equally as controversial as the previous one.
Ironically, a lot of the new bill seems to not change much at all, although you’ll have trouble getting a Democrat to agree with you on that. One of the major differences revolves around pre-existing conditions. One of the major provisions of the Obama’s plan was that insurance providers couldn’t turn away or charge more to people that already had major health problems. Naturally, this caused premiums to explode, because while that may be a noble cause, it was pretty much a suicidal move from an insurance business standpoint. Now, many are saying that Trump’s plan will cause many, many people to basically be out in the cold. Is it true? Well, as usual, that depends on who you ask.
The new plan does have a provision for pre-existing conditions, but it is quite different. This plan sets aside billions of dollars for a “high-risk” pool that theoretically should allow insurance providers to take on these customers without being so worried about what it will mean for their business and potentially passing along costs to other customers. Will it work? Who knows, right? But we at Common Sense Conspiracy want to point out that this is a classic example of our government colluding to distract us from what is really going on.
While it may seem that the battle lines are drawn between the two major political parties in the United States, the truth is that they are actually very much in on this together. With people like Elizabeth Warren outright saying people are going to die because of this new plan, it creates outrage and uncertainty. If you think that tactic is new, just remember how the other side of the aisle did much the same when ObamaCare was being pitched. They talked about death panels and your grandparents getting sent out to pasture if the government didn’t think they were worth the investment. Once again, none of this came to pass, but what it did do is create plenty of controversy and paranoia. And why would that be a good thing?
Sleight of hand. It’s as old as government itself. While everyone is outraged because of something that is clearly not going to happen, they are making moves that will very much affect each of us.
Look around. War with North Korea is getting closer. A conflict with Russia seems more and more imminent. But we are worried about a health care plan that, at the end of the day, still means our government making decisions about our health care and well-being. Notice how it doesn’t matter which party is in control, the same outcome is inevitable. The so-called party of small government isn’t getting rid of government involvement; they are installing their own version of it. Funny, isn’t it?
Be awake. Be enlightened (sorry for the Illuminati nod there). And make sure you watch what the other hand is doing.
It was a national news story the other day that people were looking up the variations of the search term “World War 3” (variations meaning they combined the totals of other ways of putting it, like World War III or actually spelling it out) more than ever at any point in the history of the Internet. This, of course, came right on the heels of the general wariness of many following Donald Trump’s unexpected ascension to the Presidency and his subsequent bombings of Syria and Afghanistan. Throw in some serious tension with Russia, and you have a lot of reasons for people to feel a little uneasy.
Nuclear powerhouses like the United States and Russia having a war of words will always concern many that it could give way to a war of nukes. However, we at Common Sense Conspiracy would like to point out that if you are looking for a nuclear bomb to go off in a World War 3 scenario, neither of these superpowers is likely to be your culprit. It’s called the theory of mutually-assured destruction, a term that rose out of the Cold War arms races and is now considered an unusual method of keeping the peace. See, both Russia and the United States possess enough nuclear weaponry and technology to effectively obliterate the other if it came down to it. They both possess the technology to make a retaliation would still take place, no matter how overwhelming a first strike may be. Basically, either one could decide to take out the other one on any given day, but they would also all but certainly seal their own fate with mutual destruction. And as messed as it may be, that acts as an extremely effective deterrent.
The problem with mutually-assured destruction is it assumes that cooler heads prevail. Putin or Trump on their worst day isn’t ready for a nuclear war with the United States or Russia respectively. There is absolutely nothing to be gained, and perhaps everything to lose. They may do a lot of things up to that point because of overinflated egos or questionable morals and world views, but at the end of the day, no one is pulling that trigger. However, when you look to the Irans and North Koreas of the world, you have a real problem. See, these regimes are different. Cooler heads do not prevail. If they acquire nuclear weapons (North Korea has at least rudimentary nukes already, and the deal with Iran made by the Obama administration could mean that it’s only a matter of time for them as well) and the means to use them effectively wherever they see fit, they don’t worry about mutual destruction. Call it bat crazy or overzealous religious maniacs, but these folks are fully aware that America or Russia could wipe them off the face of the Earth, but that fear is not enough to stop them from potentially going ahead with it. Iranian leaders have actually referenced ushering in nuclear war as a way of helping get on with Allah’s master plan. North Korea’s leadership might rather be a martyr that left a crater in America or somewhere in Asia rather than cooperate with the international community.
So, if there is a World War 3 scenario out there, we don’t really know what it is. If North Korea launched a missile anywhere at all, it would be utterly destroyed in days. If Iran tried something, they might succeed in killing a lot of innocent people, but there would not be a world conflict. They would simply be obliterated. People like to point to China, but if North Korea actually nuked someone, China would most likely condemn it and get out of the way. Unless, of course, they perceived the North Koreans as having a really good reason for what they did.
Furthermore, let’s look at why people feel this way. Tensions between Russia and the United States are heightened, especially with the mess in Syria, but remember, the American government and mainstream media can’t even decide right now whether Trump and Putin are great buddies plotting world domination in the sauna or sworn egotistical enemies set for final showdown with the world at stake. They can’t decide which narrative to push because they can’t decide which one advances their own agenda, which is the only reason the mainstream media exists in this era. The truth is that President Obama publicly stated that he wanted to do something like Trump did in response to a chemical attack. Congress declined to authorize it, and President Obama declined to put his foot down. Whether you think that is right or wrong is a personal decision, but it is fact. So, if you think Trump bombing Syria is some great provocation, it’s really no different than what has been going on for the last eight years, albeit more in-your-face than Obama’s cloak-and-dagger tactics. Believe it or not, Putin may find this strategy more palatable. At least Trump is being forward about it and not trying to array the chessboard against you with seemingly clean hands. Putin probably respects that in a crazy sort of way.
But what about Afghanistan? That war is supposed to be over and done, but here’s Trump dropping the biggest bomb next to a nuke in the American arsenal. Well, two things you need to know about the mainstream media’s portrayal of that. First of all, the MOAB bomb is the biggest, deadliest one up to a nuke. That is true. But it’s a contortion of the facts for the purpose of agenda. A nuclear weapon by today’s standards is more than 250 times more powerful than the MOAB. So, while the statement is true, the MOAB is still not even deserving of being in the conversation with a true nuclear bomb. It’s not even close. Terming that way is designed to make it sound like a lot more than it is. Also, the media makes it sound like Trump is totally behind this. Most likely, Trump had nothing to do with it, besides the known fact that he has authorized the military to do what it needs to do to get the job done against ISIS. Meaning Trump didn’t personally tell them to drop this thing. He told them to use the weapons you need to get the job done. That’s what they did. There is nothing wrong with being uneasy about this. It is natural to feel that way. But do analyze the agenda that is being laid out for you. The media is working overtime to create a narrative, and every little phrase they use to describe every little thing is part of the plan. The problem is that many believe that the mainstream media’s agenda is either Democratic or Republican (Fox or CNN, for example). Nothing could be further from the truth. The real agenda of the collective mainstream media is to influence American minds, keep the two parties divided ideologically as much as possible, and push globalism. This was the case before Trump took office, and it will almost definitely continue to be the case going forward.
Could World War 3 break out tomorrow? Sure. But it probably won’t be for any of the reasons that the average person is walking around being worried about. It’s the unknown factors that are the real reason for concern.
The news that Eddie Murphy’s brother Charlie Murphy passed away today is sure to spawn some conspiracy theories. While Charlie is not nearly as famous as his brother, he is still known for his hilarious moments on Dave Chapelle’s comedy variety show. Actually, that is part of the Illuminati rumors. Charlie Murphy frequently shared comedic stories about encounters with famous people in his youth, and one of the most popular skits was with Prince. Prince also died at the age of 57 last year under a shroud of controversy.
The word on this one is that Charlie had leukemia and had been battling for his life for years. We have no reason to really question that official story, but we will continue to keep an eye on things as more information becomes available.
Common Sense Conspiracy is not and will never be a political site. However, for the last eight years, which happens to be the whole time this organization has been in existence, conspiracy theories seemed to be the dominion of people on the conservative side of the political spectrum. This is not for any reason but just the flow of things. When Barack Obama was President, liberals were more likely to think things were going great and conspiracy theories were just nutjobs. Now, power has switched, and the Democrats are the ones constantly pointing their fingers. Is this wrong? Not at all. It’s natural in our system which fools so many people into siding when there is only one side.
Don’t worry, friends. We have forgiven you for dismissing us as tin foil hat fodder for almost a decade. Come on in. Our arms are open and ready to see what you have to bring to the debate.
We’re not here to report the news. You should know this by now if you are a regular here. There are plenty of sources for you to find the news, be it fake or somewhat based in truth. By now, you no doubt know something of the chemical attack that has now led to an American attack on Syria and setting the stage for a major conflict with Russia and perhaps the world. As you might imagine, there are plenty of conspiracy theories sprouting up like weeds on this one. Let’s examine some of the most common ones so far.
Assad got fingered when he wasn’t behind it. This theory revolves around the concept that Assad did not perpetrate this attack but was blamed for it by somebody else. The who is a whole different story. Some believe the rebels, Russia, or even a false flag perpetrated by America itself to engage in war. Each possible assailant has it’s own reasons. The most obvious is the rebels who certainly benefit from a Syrian airbase being decimated. For Donald Trump it could mean diverting attention away from the investigation of his campaign’s supposed ties to Russia. There’s probably other parties we haven’t even heard about yet.
How valid are any of these theories? It’s hard to say at this point. We at Common Sense Conspiracy are working overtime to get more real facts before we weigh in. But you can bet there’s more to the story than you will hear about on your mainstream news sources, and we will continue to make sure the real story gets told as more information becomes available.
In case you missed it, a few weeks ago President Donald Trump shocked the world when he took to Twitter to scold former President Barack Obama for wiretapping him and his associates during the presidential campaign and subsequent transition. Everyone laughed, pointed fingers, made memes, and said Trump was off his rocker. Only, now the Susan Rice revelations are showing that whether or not Trump was exactly right, he was at least not talking complete nonsense, and it will probably turn into quite a political and possibly even criminal issue as the Obama administration seeks to make Susan Rice the fall gal for the second time (remember Benghazi anyone?). We are not here to discuss the allegations and what it means. We just want to give our readers a quick scorecard so they are up to speed on where we are at with things.
Ok, let’s start back last year when Russia supposedly leaked to Wikileaks the emails that revealed that Bernie Sanders never was really in this thing, and the DNC let millions of Americans donate their hard-earned money to his campaign knowing full well that it was fixed and Hillary Clinton would be the candidate no matter what happened. Now, follow along here, Russia supposedly did this to “influence” the election by revealing to the American people that at least half of the primary process was fixed. Now, the whole Russia investigation revolves around the idea that Trump or someone close to Trump was talking and colluding with Russia to make this happen. Just in case that didn’t sink in, they are saying that Trump was colluding with Russia to leak the truth about the Democratic primary to the American people. In other words, Russia sought to influence the election in Trump’s favor by revealing to the American people just how corrupt the Democratic Party really was. And Trump was helping reveal the truth, which is what they are now investigating. I know it’s confusing.
Now, we find out that President Obama’s administration was also working hard to uncover the Trump collusion with Russia so it could leak it to the media or WikiLeaks and therefore influence the election in the other direction. Trump accused Obama of doing so, so he is now accusing Obama of doing what Obama is accusing him of doing. The scary thing is it looks like they are all right.
Yes, everyone is right. Everyone was trying to influence the election in an illegal fashion, and they were all doing it by revealing facts about each of the candidates that are basically indisputable. So, they sought to cleverly lie by telling the truth. Are you still with me?
Perhaps it would have been a lot easier if either political party could have simply found a decent human being to run for President. But that was too much to ask.