Category Archives: While You Were Sleeping

While Trump and Obama Argue Over Who Wiretapped Who, the CIA Reveals Their Tactics

In a classic move of government-sponsored deception, we are watching our two-party one-party political system battle back and forth about supposed surveillance of now-President Donald Trump while WikiLeaks releases information from the CIA that reveals unprecedented violations of American privacy. No one does deception and misdirection better, and this is no exception. What better way to divert attention away from the WikiLeaks reveal than by having it mixed up in articles about wiretapping and other such drama. The average person that laps up the mainstream media’s faux news will think that the articles are related somehow and move on to the latest moves of the Kardashians or hoping maybe another O.J. Simpson docudrama is in the works. They would never pay attention to the fact that these leaks just revealed the tactics that many conspiracy theorists were called paranoid nutcases when they suggested it.

That’s right. Your iPhone can listen to you. Your smart television might be turning itself on to check in on what you are up to. Your Amazon Alexa echo might be listening for more than just the codeword. It’s true. You thought it all along, and you were right. The CIA uses all this wonderful technology to spy on American citizens, as well as people abroad, and we now have the proof.

But let’s all worry about whether President Obama ordered Donald Trump’s tower to be wiretapped during the election. That’s insane to think Obama could do something like that. Never mind the fact that it is known that the FBI investigated Trump’s ties with Russia and then announced that there was nothing to it. Yes, that happened. Look it up. The FBI announced publicly before the election that it was looking into Trump’s ties with Russia. It then, much in the fashion that it did with Hillary Clinton twice, announced there was nothing to it. The media has continued to harp on the story, proven false by our “authorities”, ever since, and they have completely forgotten the Hillary Clinton case, which ended exactly the same way. So, if Trump is a little aggravated, he is probably right. The media is definitely choosing which fiction it wants to purvey to the public. But that doesn’t mean that Trump is some sort of freedom fighter. He is being used right now, and he was probably briefed on the supposed wiretapping situation just so he would go nuclear on Twitter and cover for this other story that it actually much bigger and much more important.

That’s why we file this article in our category called While You Were Sleeping.

Mainstream and Social Media Use Fake Photographs of National Mall to Detract From Trump Inauguration

You’ve no doubt seen the photos by now. There’s a picture directly comparing the scene at Donald Trump’s inauguration to that of President Obama. The insinuation of the comparison is clear. President Obama enjoyed record turnout for his inauguration, and Trump’s may be the worst ever in modern times. We are getting a lot of questions about whether this is true and what it means.
Well, as to the big question, it is true, although it doesn’t really mean anything. Trump’s inauguration is being estimated at 700,000 to 900,000 in attendance, far short of President Obama’s record numbers in 2009. However, those figures are deceiving as no President came even close to Obama’s number. See, President Obama’s inauguration was a much more historic event than any inauguration before because he was the first African-American President to be sworn into office. This caused his inauguration to have huge numbers that trump (no pun intended) all others before him. If you want to be realistic, Trump’s numbers are actually quite good. Check out these estimations from Snopes, a site that is not known for veering from the narrative of the mainstream media:
President Bill Clinton, 1993: 800,000 people
President Bill Clinton, 1997: 250,000 people
President George W. Bush, 2001: 300,000 people
President George W. Bush, 2005: 400,000 people
President Barack Obama, 2009: 1.8 million people
President Barack Obama, 2013: 1 million people

That’s right. Trump’s inauguration, if the higher estimate holds, may end up being the third best of all time, behind the two Obama events. And it is important to note that while both of Obama’s inaugurations were very high in attendance, the one in 2013 was not nearly as much. That’s because the event wasn’t as historic the second time it happened. In any case, it’s absolutely true that Trump’s numbers were far less than Obama’s, but that’s not as much of a slight as it sounds because his numbers are still higher than the average and may end up being the second best in the final tally.
So what about the photographs, you say? If Trump still had those kinds of numbers, what is with the empty looking National Mall picture that is now going viral on the mainstream media? Well, it’s not real, of course. The picture is of the National Mall, just not on the day of an event on the level of an inauguration. The picture is of a lesser event where there are enough people present to make the photograph believable, but not enough to look like Trump had a good day.

The mainstream media could dispel this, of course, but they wouldn’t dare. Reporting the actual news is not the business that they are in. But at the Women’s March taking place today, expect there to be plenty of pictures of how many people are in attendance. There’s a reason behind everything you see on the mainstream media’s television screen. Make no mistake, and while the jury is out on what Donald Trump is really all about, don’t think that the games being played for your mind have slowed down or are going anywhere.

New President Donald Trump Repeatedly Flashes Illuminati Hand Signs During First Speech as President

Donald Trump is now officially the 45th President of the United States. Some believe he is an outsider that took a political party by force to ride it to the White House. Others believe that he is just another puppet of the New World Order and we are about to see more of the same.
Well, in conspiracy circles, it didn’t take very long into the Trump Presidency for rumors to start circulating. Just after taking the oath of office, Trump gave a speech at the Inauguration ceremony and repeatedly flashed a well-known Illuminati hand signal (sometimes referred to as the “OK” sign). This is not something that he does on a regular basis, and many believe that his taking of the oath and actually becoming president are the reason that he is now using the gesture. What do you think? Is Trump giving the signal that the Illuminati is still calling the shots in the White House and the American shadow government? Or is this simply a sign that Trump is making accidentally?  Click the link below to watch the Trump video clip.

While You Were Sleeping: Obama Deploys Special Forces to Russian Border

Congressional hearings trying to get to the bottom of the repeated Russian hacking accusations revealed some pretty eye-opening facts on Thursday.  The hacking is now being called an “act of war” by heads of intelligence agencies as well as Senator John McCain.  This represents a really scary coalition between party lines in America to justify an upcoming showdown with Russia.  But you won’t find much mainstream news coverage about this even more interesting (and frightening) fact.  President Barack Obama, who only has two weeks left before he is no longer in his current position of authority, has deployed United States Special Forces along the Lithuania-Russia border.  What for, you ask?  Oh, yes, the unthinkable.  There is growing fears that NATO might strike Russia in some sort of misguided punitive action, and Donald Trump may be just days too late to stop it.  Would Obama approve something that might launch an all-out war with Russia just days before he leaves office?  And what would happen if he did?  Could this be the moment so many conspiracy theorists have been waiting for when Obama somehow finds a last ditch effort to declare martial law and stay in power?

What do you think?  And did you hear this on your local news?  We’re betting not.

George Michael Was Predicted to Be the Victim of an Illuminati Blood Sacrifice in 2014

The death of George Michael floored many on Christmas Day 2016. We addressed the likelihood that there is more to the story in previous articles as the news broke, but we are publishing this article to go forward with something even more suspicious. The video below shows a YouTube user that completely predicted this event in 2014. The user ZippythePinhead J in just 38 seconds revealed that George Michael would die “soon” and would be the victim of an Illuminati blood sacrifice.

It would be crazy, no doubt, except for the fact that he was exactly right.

The Government’s War on Fake News is a War on You

They are laying it on pretty thick.  In the wake of Donald Trump’s unlikely Presidential victory, the opposing party is pulling out all the stops to try to discredit his election win and explain it away.  Now, Common Sense Conspiracy is not a political site, and we have frequently explained our one-party two-party system theory about the American government.  However, in a case like this, it’s important for our readers to realize that while it looks like partisan politics playing out in a high stakes game, the loser and target is always you and I.  This situation is no exception.

The new battle cry against fake news seems like a turning point.  We all see the conservative and liberal versions of extremist news sources on our social media feeds and in our email.  It’s true that both sides are “liberal” with the facts, and in many cases, it is just spreading incorrect propaganda to forward an agenda.  However, when President Obama and company say they are going after “fake news” that is not what they mean.  Fake news to them is anything that directly takes on their narrative.  Fake news, according to the likes of Obama and Hillary Clinton, would be sites like this one.  Any site that doesn’t go along with their absurd official story and tries to inject facts into the equation will qualify as fake news in a heartbeat.

That’s what is so sinister about what they are doing here.  It’s calculated.  It may seem like it’s about Trump, or just sour grapes from sore losers of a hotly contested election.  But it’s just the beginning.  They will start by targeting the extreme news sources we referenced earlier, but soon, they will expand it out to include sites like this and any other site out there that is presenting a fact-based approach to their disinformation campaigns.

You have to look at what the other hand is doing.  It’s like a sleight-of-hand trick they are playing right in your face.  They make you think one thing, and it is a reasonable one that makes a lot of sense.  Meanwhile, the other hand is up to something much more sinister.  The only thing you can always count on in their schemes is that the loser is always going to be you.

Fake news is bad.  But the biggest proponent of fake news in America is the mainstream media.  That alone should prove that their intentions are less than honorable.

Hillary and Putin Have Beef — Are We Going to War With Russia for Democrats to Save Face?

Hillary Clinton could have done a lot of things to make her so-called love for the country front and center in the weeks since her unexpected loss to Donald Trump in the election.  She could have calmed the divide in America by rejecting the protests in the wake of her loss.  She could have discouraged civil unrest by speaking out and telling those trying to hijack the Electoral College that it’s time to unify under one American banner and accept defeat.  She did neither.  And after a period of silence, she is back out in the open doing what her and President Obama’s administration were tasked with by the New World Order to come:  work overtime to make sure America is as divided as ever.

Many, many Democrats revolve their whole schtick around their supposed anti-war sentiments.  Well, with the hacking allegations regarding Russia, it is looking ever more likely that America and Russia are headed for a showdown.  But wait a minute!  How can that be when Putin got exactly what he supposedly wanted?  After all, the word on the street (and from multiple United States’ intelligence agencies) is that Russia pulled out all the stops to make sure Donald Trump would be the next President of the United States.

Hillary now says that the reason Putin got Trump elected (because clearly that is what happened in all ways you may consider it) was because of “beef” they had that dates back to when she was Secretary of State.  According to Hillary, she herself caused major unrest in Russia and caused Putin’s own people to question his judgment.  Of course, no one remembers any of that happening in the real world, but that has never mattered if you are a Clinton.  So, an angry Putin decided to set loose his hackers on the DNC and dismantle democracy.

President Obama is pushing this hard.  Hillary Clinton is now pushing this hard.  Donald Trump says it’s all lies.  Who is right?  Who is telling the truth?  Are we about to be plunged into World War 3 with Russia all because the Democratic Party can’t accept that anything less than a massive international conspiracy could have derailed their 3rd straight stranglehold on the White House?  And aren’t they the first and foremost criticizers of conspiracy theorists everywhere?  Now, they are proposing perhaps the greatest conspiracy theory of all time to override the possibility that maybe their agenda has lost touch with the people that it is supposed to represent?

Assuming an Electoral College history-making event, Donald Trump will assume the Presidency in a few short weeks.  Perhaps this will calm down this sudden firestorm.  After all, we have President Obama, the king of doing nothing at all in the face of danger, promising “retaliation” against Russia for interfering with the American election.  Would he be as fired up if Hillary had won in a landslide?

Probably not.