The hacking group that now involves itself in all sorts of causes known as anonymous has spoken on the matter of Sandra Bland. This African American woman is yet another person that died in police custody in Texas, and many people have suggested that the police faked her suicide to cover up what really happened. Up until now, there was not exactly a whole lot of evidence to back up these claims, but Anonymous is painting a not-so-pretty picture for the Walker County Police Department in the video below, released just yesterday and already fostering nearly a half of a million views.
It should be noted for the record that this case is interesting from different viewpoints not just because of the obvious implications of a police cover-up and murder, but also how it has been treated in the media. Other cases that we all now know the details of (Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, Freddie Gray…unfortunately the list goes on and on and on) were jumped on by the mainstream media. Common Sense Conspiracy has examined the goals of the mainstream media in their coverage many times before. It is notable, however, that the mainstream media mostly ignored the case of Sandra Bland. It was reported, but it never took on the life of those other cases in the mainstream consciousness. You can make of that what you will. Perhaps the mainstream media was fooled by the Texas Police’s scheme and didn’t realize that they missed another golden opportunity to further drive a wedge between race relations in America. Or maybe there is no agenda after all. While we find that highly unlikely, we did think it was important to note that the mainstream media could have blown this case up but did not. It’s worth mentioning at the very least.
What do you think? Is Anonymous speaking on the matter enough to make you believe that Sandra Blass was murdered? Or do you think Anonymous is just throwing salt on an old wound? Let us know in the comments below.
You would think a suspected mass murderer that had just killed nine people would definitely be a candidate for a felony stop when police get an idea of where he is, right? You would expect guns drawn, cops everywhere, and someone with a bullhorn making him go through the whole procedure. Take the keys and drop them out of the car so you can’t take off or run over anyone. Get out of the car, turn around so they can make sure he doesn’t have a weapon before a cop just walks up to the door to get potentially butchered. Nope, these cops acted like Dylann Roof was wanted for unpaid traffic tickets in this now released raw video of his arrest by the Shelby Police in North Carolina.
There are two reasons this video is being released. One is to incite even more anger. African Americans are pissed when they watch this video and see the cordial way Roof was taken into custody after committing a historic atrocity. Many will say that if Roof were a black man, the arrest would have looked a lot different. So, by releasing a video that basically serves no purpose otherwise, the government is making sure that the fire is stoked and has no chance of burning out anytime soon. Incidentally, it also fits another theory. If this arrest were staged because the entire Charleston incident is fictional, then this video being released would still serve all the purposes above and more. So, from a conspiracy standpoint, many will point to this video as just more evidence that something isn’t quite right about the official story of Charleston. What do you think? Was this just an example of some smalltown cops not ready for the big fish they caught? Or is there more to the story? Is this how you would arrest a mass murderer?
It happens just a little too often to be coincidence, don’t you think? It goes all the way back to 9-11. The Boston Marathon bombings. The London subway bombings. Sandy Hook. There is a long history of events happening during practice periods for just such an event. And now the Charleston shootings are keeping with the tradition. As you might imagine, no one is reporting this on the mainstream media, but it is now a known fact that Charleston was in the midst of a federal “Active Shooter” drill when the actual shooting took place. How many times can this line up this way before there just has to be a connection? What do you think?
In what can only be labeled as unorthodox, Pope Francis is set to give a special address today on the state of the world with climate change being foremost on the agenda. That’s right, the Pope, of all people, is about to urge people to change their ways and save the Earth from the evils of modern society. That’s the story. Now Common Sense Conspiracy will examine this from many different angle so buckle up your seatbelts and get ready for the ride.
First things first, this probably will leave many Catholics and general Christians alike scratching their heads. After all, the seriously religious tend to be less likely to believe in man-made climate change, and even less likely to think that anything short of an act of God can destroy the Earth or make it uninhabitable for humanity. After all, if you believe there is an omniscient being looking over things, then it’s hard to believe that humanity could just go kaput from environmental factors before all of the prophecies in the Bible come to pass. Basically, it’s like saying that everything in the Bible is coming in the future, unless of course we destroy the Earth before God’s timetable. Even the hardiest Saturday-night partying Christians probably view this as a no-go. So, having the Pope, who is supposedly the closest thing on this Earth to Jesus Christ, tell us that we are upsetting God’s apple cart has got to be a little disturbing. It’s just one of those things you don’t expect the Pope to say. At the end of the day, the Pope isn’t supposed to do anything to suggest that maybe God doesn’t have total power, and perhaps we do hold some cards in the fate of humanity. So, that’s your religious slant on this. It’s provocative at the very least.
Now, politically, Democrats and atheists (an atheist is probably a Democrat, but a Democrat isn’t necessarily an atheist) are about to crap all over themselves with sheer delight that the Pope is doing this for all of the reasons above and more. For them, it is the ultimate mutiny for the Republican Party and Tea Party and whatever other iterations and whatever they might call themselves. They know what an uproar this will be for religious conservatives, and Democrats desperately need something to harp on in the election year coming up since the Supreme Court will most likely take their beating of the gay marriage horse off the table once and for all. So, from political points of view, this will make conservatives’ heads explode and make every Democrat smile with delight.
We know you are waiting for it. Last but most definitely not least is the conspiracy perspective, the one that is far and away our specialty. People in the conspiracy circles are standing back and looking at the big picture and realizing that as usual, nobody wins. See, regardless of how you might personally feel about religion, many people have long recognized that the elimination of religion is a major tenet in the plan for a New World Order, no matter what kind of shadowy organization you might believe is in charge. This is a major score for them. The Pope coming forward and supporting something like this is not just a win for Democrats, but a win for a one-world government. The radicalization of the Pope is just one more step on the way to the kind of totalitarian domination that the powers-that-be have long sought and firmly believe will make the world a better place.
What do you think? Does the Pope’s latest stance bother you? Excite you? Or is it just another “I told you so” on your list?
So it was a slow news day at Common Sense Conspiracy. We decided to spend the breather talking about what many people in conspiracy circles think is a very likely future event. EMP stands for electromagnetic pulse, and an EMP attack could send the United States of America back to the stone age in seconds. It would disrupt everything from communication, power, transportation, you name it. It’s the danger of a society that now depends on computers and increasingly the Internet for so many things. Even our vehicles have enough computer chips inside them that an EMP could render most modern cars useless. Yet, many people don’t even know what this is or that it is a real threat.
An EMP attack requires some serious energy, and the only way to set one off would be by detonating a nuclear level weapon in the air. This would not be a nuclear attack in the conventional sense. We’re not talking mushroom clouds. The bomb would be set off to create a situation in the atmosphere that basically destroyed everything electronic instantly (or at least made it stop functioning). An EMP attack would be a great precursor to a nation that wished to instigate a war against America. While it is assumed that the government and military have some sort of infrastructure in place to deal with the aftermath of such an attack, a country as spread out as America is would have major problems getting back to normal in any kind of reasonable time frame. It would also instantly make almost all warning systems in place useless. A lot of people get made fun of for stocking up for the “zombie apocalypse” or the end of the world as we know it, but the truth is that if an EMP attack were successfully launched against us tomorrow, those people would suddenly be the absolute top of the food chain. The video below goes in further detail about the threat and what you can do to be ready.
The Trans-Pacific Trade Agreement will be up for another Congressional vote tomorrow, and there are many grassroots efforts across the nation to convince members of Congress to vote against the controversial legislation that would give President Obama (and the next Prez after him) sweeping authorities to make trade agreements with other countries, bypassing basically every check and balance in our government’s system. It’s basically a law that asks Congress to give the President power to not have to ask Congress what to do anymore, and it could be just one of many building blocks for a new kind of government in the United States of America. The sad news: most Americans have not a clue what TPP is, what it stands for, or what it might mean for the nation going forward. While everyone is worried about whether bakers have to make cakes for gay people, Caitlyn Jenner, and whether Lebron James is better than Michael Jordan, this is being voted on on the down low, just the way President Obama wants it. What do you think? Do you think one man should hold that kind of authority in our system of government? And if you do think so, will you feel the same if someone you don’t trust as much inherits that authority in 2017?
With a new movement for transgender individuals rapidly taking shape (especially in the aftermath of the Bruce Jenner to Caitlin Jenner transformation) paired with increasing acceptance of homosexuals in American society, it seems like gender identities are the most confused they’ve ever been. Children in this day and age don’t have stark black and white portrayals of who or what they should be based on their gender. Now, granted, that is a great thing in many ways. Society has reshaped itself in such a way that females are no longer secondary to males in various industries, and when they are, it’s not just unfair but also illegal. Despite all the good, though, there are people out there that feel that there is a movement not for transgender or gay rights, but to eliminate gender identity altogether.
New World Order? Illuminati? Oppressive Big Brother-style government? Whatever name you put on it, there are plenty of theories that gender identity elimination is a big part of a one-world government movement where everyone is mostly just the same… a cog in the wheel of the machine. The video below points to figures in modern culture that are really pushing the envelope on gender identity. Jaden Smith, son of Will Smith, is a great example. As far as the world knows, Jaden is neither gay nor transsexual, and yet he seems to find enjoyment in shocking the world with his fashion choices that often mingle the sexes liberally. Is this just a way of being different? Or is this pushing people to stop making the distinction? What would the world be like if genders suddenly disappeared altogether?
Some people believe the reason for this movement is to feminize men. The concept there is that if men are bombarded with this from day one, they are less likely to fall under male stereotypes. We already live in a society where young men are increasingly behind computer screens at work and video game consoles at home. No longer are young men the hunters and gatherers of society, and they look like it. Many people in conspiracy circles believe this is a government-sanctioned movement to weaken males to make it easier for domination. Males today are less likely to be interested in guns and less likely to be a great physical specimen. They are also much less self-sufficient, which means that almost all the bases are covered with lowering the chance of resistance as the New World Order takes shape.
What do you think? We all basically agree that everyone should have the same rights (although there is widespread disagreement as to what those rights are and how they are defined), but are we also being conditioned to not just treat everyone equal, but to eliminate the concept altogether? And what does that mean for our future?