Category Archives: Sometimes It is What It Is

Donald Trump Reveals How the Establishment Reacts to an Outsider

Like our very bodies when a foreign object is inside our bodies, the establishment of American government is attacking the outsider with everything they have.  There are no rules.  No party lines.  No arm-twisting, knowing winks, and backroom deals.  This is all-out war.  We at Common Sense Conspiracy have wrestled with the idea of whether Donald Trump was a true outsider, or just another example of the shadow government making us think we had a choice.  The last few weeks have convinced us that, love him or hate him, Trump is really an outsider.  And for that, his days are numbered.

This not meant to be some sort of excuse for Trump.  Trump’s Twitter ramblings are embarrassing, his over-the-top rhetoric stomach-turning at times, and he definitely has shown that he didn’t have as many plans as he boasted about on the campaign trail.  Having said that, the calls for his impeachment in the mounting pile of non-evidence is astounding.

If Trump was Mike Pence, the Republican Party would be circling around him and defending him to the max.  That’s because Pence is a full-fledged member of the establishment.  In America, there is a political hierarchy, albeit an unofficial one.  Politicians are loyal to their party, but the establishment comes first.  And the establishment blurs all political lines.  At the establishment level, Republicans want Trump gone as much as Democrats do.  Why?  He is a threat to their very existence.  He is a threat to the stranglehold that the shadow government has on the American people and the slow-developing plan they have for America’s future.

Now does this mean that Trump is some kind of hero?  No, not at all.  In fact, whether you like him or not, you have to admit that this is probably going to end badly, and when all is said and done, he probably would have been a lot happier and safer if he had just remained a really rich celebrity enjoying life to the fullest.  Remember that a little over 18 months ago, the same people lambasting him would have crapped in their pants to get invited to one of this parties.  There was nothing wrong with Donald Trump until he decided to come onto their turf.  The penalty for that will be quite harsh indeed.

Will they impeach him?  People will toss this around, but the truth is that they aren’t going to stop.  They have already proven that evidence does not matter.  They don’t care.  They will find something he said and they will present it in such a way to get what they want.  Democrats will fight tooth and nail to make Mike Pence their President.  Because he is not a threat.  He is just another member of the establishment, and while they will oppose him publicly, behind the scenes they will pat each other on the back and make plans for the future.

Trump is fighting the worst situation a President has ever faced.  To have both your own party and the enemy both salivating for your head on a platter in the cutthroat world of Washington politics makes it pretty hard to survive.  Remember, no evidence is needed.  They can impeach Trump on principle if they want to.  Those Republicans that supported Trump will turn on him.  This is not necessarily because they want to or not, but because they must lest the establishment machine chew them up and spit them out as well.

Trump may not have been your dream candidate, but he did prove that an outsider can waltz into this thing.  And now that the establishment has been made aware of this hole in their security, you can bet they will make sure it never happens again.  The New World Order hung in the balance for a second there, but don’t worry globalists.  The American shadow government is going to do everything it can to force Trump out.  And if that doesn’t work, well, we all know what comes next.

 

World War 3 Sure is Getting Tossed Around a Lot on the Internet

It was a national news story the other day that people were looking up the variations of the search term “World War 3” (variations meaning they combined the totals of other ways of putting it, like World War III or actually spelling it out) more than ever at any point in the history of the Internet. This, of course, came right on the heels of the general wariness of many following Donald Trump’s unexpected ascension to the Presidency and his subsequent bombings of Syria and Afghanistan. Throw in some serious tension with Russia, and you have a lot of reasons for people to feel a little uneasy.

The mother of all bombs, they say. It’s just junior-varsity if you’re talking about nukes though.

Nuclear powerhouses like the United States and Russia having a war of words will always concern many that it could give way to a war of nukes. However, we at Common Sense Conspiracy would like to point out that if you are looking for a nuclear bomb to go off in a World War 3 scenario, neither of these superpowers is likely to be your culprit. It’s called the theory of mutually-assured destruction, a term that rose out of the Cold War arms races and is now considered an unusual method of keeping the peace. See, both Russia and the United States possess enough nuclear weaponry and technology to effectively obliterate the other if it came down to it. They both possess the technology to make a retaliation would still take place, no matter how overwhelming a first strike may be. Basically, either one could decide to take out the other one on any given day, but they would also all but certainly seal their own fate with mutual destruction. And as messed as it may be, that acts as an extremely effective deterrent.

The problem with mutually-assured destruction is it assumes that cooler heads prevail. Putin or Trump on their worst day isn’t ready for a nuclear war with the United States or Russia respectively. There is absolutely nothing to be gained, and perhaps everything to lose. They may do a lot of things up to that point because of overinflated egos or questionable morals and world views, but at the end of the day, no one is pulling that trigger. However, when you look to the Irans and North Koreas of the world, you have a real problem. See, these regimes are different. Cooler heads do not prevail. If they acquire nuclear weapons (North Korea has at least rudimentary nukes already, and the deal with Iran made by the Obama administration could mean that it’s only a matter of time for them as well) and the means to use them effectively wherever they see fit, they don’t worry about mutual destruction. Call it bat crazy or overzealous religious maniacs, but these folks are fully aware that America or Russia could wipe them off the face of the Earth, but that fear is not enough to stop them from potentially going ahead with it. Iranian leaders have actually referenced ushering in nuclear war as a way of helping get on with Allah’s master plan. North Korea’s leadership might rather be a martyr that left a crater in America or somewhere in Asia rather than cooperate with the international community.

So, if there is a World War 3 scenario out there, we don’t really know what it is. If North Korea launched a missile anywhere at all, it would be utterly destroyed in days. If Iran tried something, they might succeed in killing a lot of innocent people, but there would not be a world conflict. They would simply be obliterated. People like to point to China, but if North Korea actually nuked someone, China would most likely condemn it and get out of the way. Unless, of course, they perceived the North Koreans as having a really good reason for what they did.

Furthermore, let’s look at why people feel this way. Tensions between Russia and the United States are heightened, especially with the mess in Syria, but remember, the American government and mainstream media can’t even decide right now whether Trump and Putin are great buddies plotting world domination in the sauna or sworn egotistical enemies set for final showdown with the world at stake. They can’t decide which narrative to push because they can’t decide which one advances their own agenda, which is the only reason the mainstream media exists in this era. The truth is that President Obama publicly stated that he wanted to do something like Trump did in response to a chemical attack. Congress declined to authorize it, and President Obama declined to put his foot down. Whether you think that is right or wrong is a personal decision, but it is fact. So, if you think Trump bombing Syria is some great provocation, it’s really no different than what has been going on for the last eight years, albeit more in-your-face than Obama’s cloak-and-dagger tactics. Believe it or not, Putin may find this strategy more palatable. At least Trump is being forward about it and not trying to array the chessboard against you with seemingly clean hands. Putin probably respects that in a crazy sort of way.

But what about Afghanistan? That war is supposed to be over and done, but here’s Trump dropping the biggest bomb next to a nuke in the American arsenal. Well, two things you need to know about the mainstream media’s portrayal of that. First of all, the MOAB bomb is the biggest, deadliest one up to a nuke. That is true. But it’s a contortion of the facts for the purpose of agenda. A nuclear weapon by today’s standards is more than 250 times more powerful than the MOAB. So, while the statement is true, the MOAB is still not even deserving of being in the conversation with a true nuclear bomb. It’s not even close. Terming that way is designed to make it sound like a lot more than it is. Also, the media makes it sound like Trump is totally behind this. Most likely, Trump had nothing to do with it, besides the known fact that he has authorized the military to do what it needs to do to get the job done against ISIS. Meaning Trump didn’t personally tell them to drop this thing. He told them to use the weapons you need to get the job done. That’s what they did. There is nothing wrong with being uneasy about this. It is natural to feel that way. But do analyze the agenda that is being laid out for you. The media is working overtime to create a narrative, and every little phrase they use to describe every little thing is part of the plan. The problem is that many believe that the mainstream media’s agenda is either Democratic or Republican (Fox or CNN, for example). Nothing could be further from the truth. The real agenda of the collective mainstream media is to influence American minds, keep the two parties divided ideologically as much as possible, and push globalism. This was the case before Trump took office, and it will almost definitely continue to be the case going forward.

Could World War 3 break out tomorrow? Sure. But it probably won’t be for any of the reasons that the average person is walking around being worried about. It’s the unknown factors that are the real reason for concern.

Susan Rice Revelation Amidst Russia Probe Proves the Full Corruption of the American Government

In case you missed it, a few weeks ago President Donald Trump shocked the world when he took to Twitter to scold former President Barack Obama for wiretapping him and his associates during the presidential campaign and subsequent transition. Everyone laughed, pointed fingers, made memes, and said Trump was off his rocker. Only, now the Susan Rice revelations are showing that whether or not Trump was exactly right, he was at least not talking complete nonsense, and it will probably turn into quite a political and possibly even criminal issue as the Obama administration seeks to make Susan Rice the fall gal for the second time (remember Benghazi anyone?). We are not here to discuss the allegations and what it means. We just want to give our readers a quick scorecard so they are up to speed on where we are at with things.

Ok, let’s start back last year when Russia supposedly leaked to Wikileaks the emails that revealed that Bernie Sanders never was really in this thing, and the DNC let millions of Americans donate their hard-earned money to his campaign knowing full well that it was fixed and Hillary Clinton would be the candidate no matter what happened. Now, follow along here, Russia supposedly did this to “influence” the election by revealing to the American people that at least half of the primary process was fixed. Now, the whole Russia investigation revolves around the idea that Trump or someone close to Trump was talking and colluding with Russia to make this happen. Just in case that didn’t sink in, they are saying that Trump was colluding with Russia to leak the truth about the Democratic primary to the American people. In other words, Russia sought to influence the election in Trump’s favor by revealing to the American people just how corrupt the Democratic Party really was. And Trump was helping reveal the truth, which is what they are now investigating. I know it’s confusing.

Now, we find out that President Obama’s administration was also working hard to uncover the Trump collusion with Russia so it could leak it to the media or WikiLeaks and therefore influence the election in the other direction. Trump accused Obama of doing so, so he is now accusing Obama of doing what Obama is accusing him of doing. The scary thing is it looks like they are all right.

Yes, everyone is right. Everyone was trying to influence the election in an illegal fashion, and they were all doing it by revealing facts about each of the candidates that are basically indisputable. So, they sought to cleverly lie by telling the truth. Are you still with me?

Perhaps it would have been a lot easier if either political party could have simply found a decent human being to run for President. But that was too much to ask.

The FBI is Investigating Trump Campaign for Collusion With Russia — Influencing the Election By Telling the Truth?

It is pretty spectacular. James Comey today announced that the FBI is investigating whether the Trump campaign (you know, the one that won the election) colluded with Russia to influence the election. That’s pretty crazy news, if not surprising. We were already amazed that Hillary Clinton was able to run for president while being constantly investigated by the FBI (still ongoing, as a matter of fact), and now our sitting President is the subject of an investigation as well. The really crazy thing about it is that while it may be troubling if Trump’s campaign really was making deals with Russia to try to win the election, it doesn’t change the facts about the whole thing. Here’s a shocking revelation for you.

If Russia did try to influence the election, they did it only by revealing true things to Americans about their existing government. Let that sink in for a moment. That’s right. They didn’t hack electronic voting machines and change votes to Trump. They didn’t smear his opponent’s name with stories that were not true. They simply released information that Americans were never supposed to know, among those that the Democratic primary was a put-up deal from day one. Can you be accused of influencing an election by simply making public information the public should have had anyway?

Now, we’re not making a political statement here. The opinion of Common Sense Conspiracy is well known. We are not supporting Trump or Clinton with this message. What we are doing is just reminding everyone that this supposed “collusion” is being reported like it’s a dirty thing. In reality, Russia did the American people a solid by letting us know that our government is a lot closer to Putin’s government than we may have thought beforehand. Unfortunately for Hillary, her name is synonymous with government corruption, so it kind of puts a bad taste in people’s mouth. What’s more, what difference would it make if Russia had revealed damning information about Trump or the RNC? Trump survived the now infamous tape of him saying atrocities and it didn’t even slow down his train. And the RNC might have wished they had a plan like the Democrats did, but we all know that primary wasn’t fixed because of who won it.

So, when you watch these reports of how evil Russia tried to influence the American election, think whatever you like. But remember how they did it… by telling us the truth.

Mainstream and Social Media Use Fake Photographs of National Mall to Detract From Trump Inauguration

You’ve no doubt seen the photos by now. There’s a picture directly comparing the scene at Donald Trump’s inauguration to that of President Obama. The insinuation of the comparison is clear. President Obama enjoyed record turnout for his inauguration, and Trump’s may be the worst ever in modern times. We are getting a lot of questions about whether this is true and what it means.
Well, as to the big question, it is true, although it doesn’t really mean anything. Trump’s inauguration is being estimated at 700,000 to 900,000 in attendance, far short of President Obama’s record numbers in 2009. However, those figures are deceiving as no President came even close to Obama’s number. See, President Obama’s inauguration was a much more historic event than any inauguration before because he was the first African-American President to be sworn into office. This caused his inauguration to have huge numbers that trump (no pun intended) all others before him. If you want to be realistic, Trump’s numbers are actually quite good. Check out these estimations from Snopes, a site that is not known for veering from the narrative of the mainstream media:
President Bill Clinton, 1993: 800,000 people
President Bill Clinton, 1997: 250,000 people
President George W. Bush, 2001: 300,000 people
President George W. Bush, 2005: 400,000 people
President Barack Obama, 2009: 1.8 million people
President Barack Obama, 2013: 1 million people

That’s right. Trump’s inauguration, if the higher estimate holds, may end up being the third best of all time, behind the two Obama events. And it is important to note that while both of Obama’s inaugurations were very high in attendance, the one in 2013 was not nearly as much. That’s because the event wasn’t as historic the second time it happened. In any case, it’s absolutely true that Trump’s numbers were far less than Obama’s, but that’s not as much of a slight as it sounds because his numbers are still higher than the average and may end up being the second best in the final tally.
So what about the photographs, you say? If Trump still had those kinds of numbers, what is with the empty looking National Mall picture that is now going viral on the mainstream media? Well, it’s not real, of course. The picture is of the National Mall, just not on the day of an event on the level of an inauguration. The picture is of a lesser event where there are enough people present to make the photograph believable, but not enough to look like Trump had a good day.

The mainstream media could dispel this, of course, but they wouldn’t dare. Reporting the actual news is not the business that they are in. But at the Women’s March taking place today, expect there to be plenty of pictures of how many people are in attendance. There’s a reason behind everything you see on the mainstream media’s television screen. Make no mistake, and while the jury is out on what Donald Trump is really all about, don’t think that the games being played for your mind have slowed down or are going anywhere.

George Michael Was Predicted to Be the Victim of an Illuminati Blood Sacrifice in 2014

The death of George Michael floored many on Christmas Day 2016. We addressed the likelihood that there is more to the story in previous articles as the news broke, but we are publishing this article to go forward with something even more suspicious. The video below shows a YouTube user that completely predicted this event in 2014. The user ZippythePinhead J in just 38 seconds revealed that George Michael would die “soon” and would be the victim of an Illuminati blood sacrifice.

It would be crazy, no doubt, except for the fact that he was exactly right.

The Government’s War on Fake News is a War on You

They are laying it on pretty thick.  In the wake of Donald Trump’s unlikely Presidential victory, the opposing party is pulling out all the stops to try to discredit his election win and explain it away.  Now, Common Sense Conspiracy is not a political site, and we have frequently explained our one-party two-party system theory about the American government.  However, in a case like this, it’s important for our readers to realize that while it looks like partisan politics playing out in a high stakes game, the loser and target is always you and I.  This situation is no exception.

The new battle cry against fake news seems like a turning point.  We all see the conservative and liberal versions of extremist news sources on our social media feeds and in our email.  It’s true that both sides are “liberal” with the facts, and in many cases, it is just spreading incorrect propaganda to forward an agenda.  However, when President Obama and company say they are going after “fake news” that is not what they mean.  Fake news to them is anything that directly takes on their narrative.  Fake news, according to the likes of Obama and Hillary Clinton, would be sites like this one.  Any site that doesn’t go along with their absurd official story and tries to inject facts into the equation will qualify as fake news in a heartbeat.

That’s what is so sinister about what they are doing here.  It’s calculated.  It may seem like it’s about Trump, or just sour grapes from sore losers of a hotly contested election.  But it’s just the beginning.  They will start by targeting the extreme news sources we referenced earlier, but soon, they will expand it out to include sites like this and any other site out there that is presenting a fact-based approach to their disinformation campaigns.

You have to look at what the other hand is doing.  It’s like a sleight-of-hand trick they are playing right in your face.  They make you think one thing, and it is a reasonable one that makes a lot of sense.  Meanwhile, the other hand is up to something much more sinister.  The only thing you can always count on in their schemes is that the loser is always going to be you.

Fake news is bad.  But the biggest proponent of fake news in America is the mainstream media.  That alone should prove that their intentions are less than honorable.