Is the New World Order Movement Seeking to Eliminate Gender Differences?

With a new movement for transgender individuals rapidly taking shape (especially in the aftermath of the Bruce Jenner to Caitlin Jenner transformation) paired with increasing acceptance of homosexuals in American society, it seems like gender identities are the most confused they’ve ever been.  Children in this day and age don’t have stark black and white portrayals of who or what they should be based on their gender.  Now, granted, that is a great thing in many ways.  Society has reshaped itself in such a way that females are no longer secondary to males in various industries, and when they are, it’s not just unfair but also illegal.  Despite all the good, though, there are people out there that feel that there is a movement not for transgender or gay rights, but to eliminate gender identity altogether.

Perhaps the male gender was already doing enough to render itself defenseless already.
Perhaps the male gender was already doing enough to render itself defenseless already.

New World Order?  Illuminati?  Oppressive Big Brother-style government?  Whatever name you put on it, there are plenty of theories that gender identity elimination is a big part of a one-world government movement where everyone is mostly just the same… a cog in the wheel of the machine.  The video below points to figures in modern culture that are really pushing the envelope on gender identity.  Jaden Smith, son of Will Smith, is a great example.  As far as the world knows, Jaden is neither gay nor transsexual, and yet he seems to find enjoyment in shocking the world with his fashion choices that often mingle the sexes liberally.  Is this just a way of being different?  Or is this pushing people to stop making the distinction?  What would the world be like if genders suddenly disappeared altogether?

Some people believe the reason for this movement is to feminize men.  The concept there is that if men are bombarded with this from day one, they are less likely to fall under male stereotypes.  We already live in a society where young men are increasingly behind computer screens at work and video game consoles at home.  No longer are young men the hunters and gatherers of society, and they look like it.  Many people in conspiracy circles believe this is a government-sanctioned movement to weaken males to make it easier for domination.   Males today are less likely to be interested in guns and less likely to be a great physical specimen.  They are also much less self-sufficient, which means that almost all the bases are covered with lowering the chance of resistance as the New World Order takes shape.

What do you think?  We all basically agree that everyone should have the same rights (although there is widespread disagreement as to what those rights are and how they are defined), but are we also being conditioned to not just treat everyone equal, but to eliminate the concept altogether?  And what does that mean for our future?

3 thoughts on “Is the New World Order Movement Seeking to Eliminate Gender Differences?”

  1. I think that the deep state and global elites are pushing the “nonbinary” agenda, but I don’t think it’s about feminization per se. I’m reminded of Ayn Rand’s “Anthem.”

  2. I think that the deep state and global elites are pushing the “nonbinary” movement, but I don’t think it’s about feminization per se. I’m reminded of Ayn Rand’s “Anthem.”

  3. “No longer are young men the hunters and gatherers of society”

    Men were never the gatherers of society, at least no moreso than women were the hunters of society. The idea that men provide the resources a family/community needs while the women stay home and just raise the kids/keep the house nice is a European idea that came about long afterwards, and it’s never even been true except for wealthier families. Even in the post-WW2 era, where the ideal woman was the happy housewife, women in poor families still had to work and contribute to the household income.

    In hunter/gatherer days, it was mostly men hunting and mostly women gathering or doing rudimentary pre-agriculture. In places like parts of Africa, where there’s a ton of edible plant foods around, women provided the majority of calories for the tribe. In some cases, men’s hunting efforts actually were a net negative in terms of calories, but meat was important as a nutritional supplement, which is why it was still worth doing. In colder/more barren places like the far north, most meat and clothing came from things like fishing, whale hunts and other wild animal products.

    Why did women gather and men hunt? Hunting is very difficult to do while carrying a baby or looking after small children. Gathering is not so much. If you have to stop working for a minute to chase after a kid, the berries and roots are not going to run away.

    What proof do we have that women were the primary gatherers? Off the top of my head, there are two pieces of evidence I know of. The first is that we’ve done quite a lot of study on the hunter/gatherer tribes that still exist, and how their traditional cultures work. The second is that women and men have genetic differences in how their physical senses work. Women have a better sense of smell than men do, they are better at discerning colors, they are far less likely to be colourblind. All of these traits help people gather food. Men meanwhile have a better ability to sense small motions from far away — perfect for hunting. One idea in evolution is “use it or lose it”, meaning that if a species has a trait that costs energy/resources to maintain (like sharper senses) and it goes unused, the trait will go away. This is because if you’re not using that trait, it’s purely a cost to you, and the members of the species who lack the trait are more likely to survive, because they aren’t spending resources on things they don’t need.

Leave a Reply to Truth Matters Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.