Subscribe

Latest Entries »

images-87The New York Times recently published an article where it was revealed from the ever-present “anonymous sources” that President Obama has expressed a desire in private to “go Bulworth.”  So, quickly, what does that mean?

Bulworth is a movie from 1995 about a Democratic Senator on a downward spiral that hires an assassin to kill him.  Bulworth, played by Warren Beatty, decides that because he has already paid the cash to get a hitman to off him in three days, there’s no reason to play political bullshit games any longer.  So, instead, he goes on the rampage, exposing just how corrupt the Washington scene is and saying exactly what he thinks about every issue with no regard for polls or political implications.

So, when President Obama says he dreams about “going Bulworth,” it basically means that he sometimes wishes he could throw all the political affiliations aside, and just tell it like it is.  Tell people what he really thinks.  Stop worrying about any of it and just do what he feels and believes is right.

So, basically, when he says he dreams about “going Bulworth,” it means he dreams about being his own person, and telling the truth at any given moment.

What a novel concept.

Why should this offend you?  Well, what Obama is being claimed to have said in the New York Times is the very problem with American politics.  He doesn’t say what he really thinks or feels.  He tows a party line.  He towed it into the White House, and there’s no turning back now.  When you live a lie, you have to live it to the bitter end.  It’s not just Obama.  Every President we have is just the same.  They walk the path appointed because they have now mired themselves in such a bed of lies that it is impossible to quit lying.  You know, just like your momma taught you when you were little.

Why should it offend every American?  Because you have to vote for these nimrods.  Every single American citizen that voted for President Barack Obama has no idea what he is really about or what he would do if he was left to his own devices.  That’s pretty staggering.  We have to vote on people that we have no idea what they believe, because, at the end of the day, they are just puppet-mouths for one party or the other.

So, let’s do away with this talk of “going Bulworth.”  Let’s call it what really is.  President Barack Obama sometimes dreams of doing what’s right.  He sometimes dreams of telling the truth.  He sometimes dreams of telling people what he really thinks and not what he is told is his opinion.  He sometimes dreams of doing the right thing day to day, and not letting politics rule every choice he makes, from national policy to what dinner he orders from the White House cook.

The irony here is that his dreams of “going Bulworth” might be exactly what America needs.  We need a leader to throw the two-party political system out the window and do what is right one choice at a time.  And we need to know what they really think when they are running for the office so we can know whether they fit in with our beliefs.  Not every candidate will completely gel with any one voter, but that’s part of the game.  You choose the person you feel will be best and who closest lines up with your beliefs.  People say all the time that American voters don’t really educate themselves on candidates.  Maybe it’s because they long ago realized it makes no difference.  You are not voting for a person; you are voting for Democrats or Republicans and a non-negotiable platform that may have a few high points that you like, but is mostly political games.

It makes perfect sense.  Going Bulworth means telling the truth and doing the right thing.  This will obviously make you a rogue in Washington.

It just might make you a hero to ordinary Americans everywhere?

But heroes still have to pay their own bills, and there’s no guarantee that they will be taken care of forever.

Why is it that in all areas of life, it always seems that the path of least resistance is always the one that is synonymous with selling out to a system and doing something morally reprehensible?

So for our last part…why it doesn’t.  Well, the American people have had the two-party system shoved down their throats for so long that they have succumbed to it.  They don’t expect Obama to pick for himself.  They know what they have done.  They have voted for a man who is a puppet for a political party.  That’s it.  That’s all there is to it.  Americans are not offended by the fact that Obama basically publicly stated that he lies all the time.  Why?  Because it’s ordinary, commonplace, standard.  It’s how we do business in a corrupt political system, and it’s how President Obama will continue to do business.  Just like most of the Presidents before him.

We say most.  The few that decided to “go Bulworth” are mostly dead.  Not by natural causes.

Could we see something like this again?  I don't think so.

Could we see something like this again? I don’t think so.

After a week of increasingly uglier scandals, there is a lot of chatter and debate on forums and websites all over about whether President Obama should consider resigning from the office of President of the United States.  Your first gut reaction to that is probably “Oh, that’s just a bunch of Republicans talking crap.”  It’s an understandable reaction, but in reality, the calls for a historic second resignation of the office are not just from the mouths of conservatives.  A lot of people in conspiracy circles are actually more independents or Libertarians, and a lot of them have raised the question as well.  So, Common Sense Conspiracy wanted to put your fears at rest (or end your hopeful excitement, as it were) by taking a realistic look at what is going on and giving our trademark dose of common sense on top of it.

President Obama will not resign from the office of President of the United States.  He will not even entertain the notion, and has at this very moment, not even once considered it with any seriousness.  But is that because he is so proud and can’t see the slippery slope that his administration is cascading down?

Well, actually the slippery slope is not that slippery.  The Benghazi incident is made out to be so damning by Republicans, but, as we detailed in our article The Truth About Benghazi Revealed, across the annals of history, this scandal doesn’t really deserve a spot on the scandal Richter Scale.  Yes, it came up during an election year, which is probably the only reason it ever was more than a silly international blurb in your local newspaper.  Other than that, there’s not much to say about it.  If anyone is going to be really feel any political effects from Benghazi, it would probably be Hillary Clinton.  But time is on her side.  President Obama’s second term of office is just getting started, and she has plenty of time to watch the Benghzi wildfire burn itself out.  Bottom line:  there’s a lot of commotion about it, but at the end of the day, not much will come of it.  The Republicans would be wise to move on to the next scandal they can trounce on.  One thing is for sure:  there will probably be another one.

Some of you on the Democratic side of the conversation are probably wagging your head to that last statement.  ”Sure there will be another scandal.  The Republicans will find something to fabricate or bend to make one.”  Well, you’re right.  That’s the state of politics in our country.  But it is not at all limited to Republicans.  If the President were currently a Republican, the Democratic Party would be pulling out all the stops to bury him, just like what you’re seeing now.  You need only thumb back to George W. Bush for some prime examples.  Democrats everywhere are still mumbling about “Weapons of Mass Destruction” despite the fact that they voted with Bush to go to war with Iraq based on the same CIA intelligence that he saw.  Was it possibly a blunder?  Sure.  You can definitely make a strong argument for that.  However, to blame it on Bush and not the whole political system of the United States of America is, well, American politics.  So, it’s true.  The Republicans will find another scandal.  As a matter of fact, pound for pound, there is always a scandal going on in all presidencies, and right now, the so-called mountain of scandal against Obama is not uncommon at all.  If you could take a flashbulb snapshot at any presidency at any given moment, you will probably find that the scandal meter is not really that much higher right now than it ever was.  So, all we’re saying is that if you think a preponderance of scandal is what is going to force President Obama to throw in the towel, it’s quite possible that said preponderance doesn’t actually exist.

Other scandals, like the IRS singling out conservative groups, are being drummed up as a big mess, but President Obama has very little, if anything at all, to do with it.  Yes, it’s a little troubling that the IRS might be doing that at all, especially against the backdrop of an election year, but, hey, at the end of the day, it means maybe the IRS has a little too much of one party at the top (Obama already took care of some of that in his reaction by terminating some of the instigators).  I don’t think anyone except the most ardent Republican supporter believes that President Obama or a representative of his office visited the IRS and asked them to pull the strings.  So, once again, it’s ugly, but it’s not that ugly.  Hell, for Common Sense Conspiracy, we would say that Monsanto legislation he allowed is way more of a scandal than any of these things.

So, moving right along…President Obama would not resign, nor has any reason to do so, due to scandal.  And for those that are anxiously hoping that he will do so, have you thought this all the way through?  President Obama stepping out means Joe Biden is the new President.  Congratulations.  What if he gets wrapped up in the same firestorm that takes the President down?  Well, then, by law, you get Boehner.  That’s right.  If #1 and #2 either resign or die in office, it goes to the other side.  The House Speaker John Boehner would be the President.  Now, some Republicans might be okay with that, but most in the center-right or center-left are just as mortified at that prospect.  What if someone takes him out?  Then we get, gasp, John Kerry.  That’s right.  #4 is the Secretary of State.  So a guy that couldn’t beat George W. Bush (often referred to as The Worst President of the United States EVER) would then stumble his way into the presidency.  So, if you’re pulling for Obama to step aside, you might want to check into who is stepping in.

Of course, Joe Biden might be the most surprised of all if he suddenly became President.

Of course, Joe Biden might be the most surprised of all if he suddenly became President.

On top of all that, there is one more reason why a President Obama resignation would be disastrous, no matter how much you might personally wish to see it happen.  A resignation or impeachment of President Obama would probably set race relations in the country back fifty years instantly.  President Obama is the first black President.  He has an overwhelming majority of support from African Americans.  To see this historic occasion come to pass and then see him forced out of office (it would be interpreted that way, regardless of whether he voluntarily resigned or involuntarily was impeached) by the Republican Party (a.k.a a bunch of old white men) would probably set off the most significant racially-motivated riot that any of us currently alive has ever witnessed.

So, it might be fun to talk about.  It might be fun to debate.  But it’s completely ridiculous and silly to think for one second that the President of the United States is going to resign over any of this and with this much on the line.

If he does, we’ll close this website down.  The second it happens, and apologize to each and every one of you for wasting your time.

Pin the tail on the Benghazi!  Most Americans couldn't find it on a globe, much less find time in their Honey Boo Boo and Dancing with the Stars to give a fuck.

Pin the tail on the Benghazi! Most Americans couldn’t find it on a globe, much less find time in their Honey Boo Boo and Dancing with the Stars to give a fuck.

Deepthroat has spoken.  Common Sense Conspiracy wants to end all of the speculation, rumors, and diatribes about the Benghazi incident and the supposed scandalous unraveling of President Obama and his administration.  This won’t take long.  This may be the shortest article we’ve ever written.

The ambassador was killed.  The embassy was attacked.  It was an election year, in fact, just a short month or so away from the election.  The administration didn’t want to look like they dropped the ball, so they tried to act like it wasn’t that big of a deal.

It wasn’t.

In fact, the same incident happened quite a few times during George W. Bush’s presidency without any fanfare.  But it wasn’t an election year, was it?

The “cover-up” was more like “damage control.”

Conspiracy…yes.  This might be one of those that is so obvious a conspiracy that it can’t even be defined as a conspiracy.

They can investigate this for years if they want to, but we just summed up the entire situation in this article.

Total taxpayer dollars wasted:  0

images-83Common Sense Conspiracy frequently parades around other popular conspiracy sites to see what they are reporting.  Not because we want to steal their stories, but because we want to see what the temperature of the conspiracy paradigm is at the moment.  Basically, there is a pattern to the normal conspiracy sites that don’t base their material on factual data but on charming and alarming creations to cause a stir and lure in viewers.  We aren’t going to outright name the other sites, but many of you know what we’re talking about.  A big story breaks on one; it then makes the circuit, and pretty soon, this effect of gloom and doom can be created.  Some people fall for this system and start to believe things they otherwise wouldn’t just because it is being bombarded on them by so many “independent” sources.

A lot of the major conspiracy websites run about like the mainstream media.  That is, they are all about the numbers and afraid to get left behind on any hot-button issue.  Of course, both the mainstream media and the conspiracy websites we are referring to have no respect for authenticity, reporting the news, or checking facts.  It’s all about being first to the party.  CNN has been mighty guilty lately of reporting things erroneously in an effort to get ahead of the other news organizations, many of which CNN accuses of falsehoods on a regular basis.  It’s a race…and while the conspiracy circuit is totally different in nature, it functions in much the same way.

Right now the story that is running the circuit hard is a bold prediction that conditions are now ripe for a MAJOR false-flag operation in the next week.  You can go to any of the major conspiracy sites out there, and there will be a major, front-page story about this right now.  And it may even capitalize MAJOR to capture your attention, or some sites even go farther with blinking text, graphics, and everything short of a naked woman to try to suck you into pushing your mouse button.  As you can see, Common Sense Conspiracy is not running that story, but because we had some of our loyal readers question whether this was something to be truly concerned about, we saw it fit to address it to try to bring some, well, common sense to the equation.

All of the stories say the same thing with a little different wording.  The government is planning a major false-flag operation to take America’s minds away from some of the craziness going on in our government right now.  There’s the Benghazi thing, with more information coming out daily.  There’s the revelation that the IRS seems to pick on certain groups more than others in its validation process.  The Boston Marathon bombings have evolved into perhaps one of the biggest conspiracy theories around.  The stories say that all of these distractions are leading to more distrust in the American government, and yes, even President Barack Obama himself.  So, it’s time to bring the nation back to its patriot roots with a good 9/11-esque false flag.  A little shock and awe effect to make Americans forget the gun control bickering, Benghazi accusations, and get back to the business of being the puppets of the government to do their every wish and bidding.

All of the articles give that same curious deadline.  Within a week.  Five to seven days.  Hide the women and children.  Buy some bottled water.  We’re in for it.  Somebody’s going down in a blaze of glory, and you never know where they will strike this time.

images-84What does Common Sense Conspiracy say?  It’s garbage.  Do we believe that the government plans operations like this from time to time?  Absolutely.  But these are watershed moments in history, and they don’t usually come very close together.  Another false flag would not bolster American support of the government; it would likely lead to more name-calling, blame-placing, and even more conspiracy theories.  So, the idea that this will quash unrest is just silly.  Additionally, the amount of scandal we are seeing in Washington right now is ugly, but it’s not unusual.  We believe you could find similar levels of controversy in any administration at any given time.  Why a false flag would now have to be imminent, in a limited time range of a week, we can’t imagine.  Oh, yes we can.  It’s just standard fare for these conspiracy sites to try to get attention and fear-monger.  They don’t have to have facts.  That would just be a waste of their time and resources.  Why not make doomsday predictions with absolutely nothing to go on?  That’s way more fun.  And, until Common Sense Conspiracy came along, there was no one to oppose them.  We are not against conspiracy theories.  We are not a “debunk” site.  We call plenty of conspiracies just what they are, but on this one, we have to cry foul and refuse to go with the cool kids in the crowd.  There is no reason to think that a false flag operation is any more likely this week than any other.

Another thing to think about:  you would be shocked by how many Americans don’t give two shits about Benghazi and what happened there.  These other conspiracy sites are playing this angle up.  They are trying to make it seem as if Americans en masse are condemning President Obama on this issue.  The reality is that the same detractors to Mr. Obama are saying the same things they always say; his supporters turn their cheek and scoff at any mention of a cover-up or that anyone in the administration knew anything.  The average American was spellbound while the Boston Police hunted Tsarnaev, and woefully disinterested by the Republican Party’s desperate attempt to make Benghazi a real issue.

We aren’t saying that Americans shouldn’t care about Benghazi.  However, we don’t think the government, or President Obama, for that matter, are shaking in their boots that the American public is incensed about Benghazi.  If they want a false-flag, then they’ll have one.  But it won’t be for any of the reasons or timetables that our conspiracy website friends have listed.

Friend of foe?  Both, actually.

Friend of foe? Both, actually.

Some things seem to yo-yo back and forth in the health and wellness world.  One study tells you eating eggs will kill you.  Next week it’s imperative that you eat more eggs.  Coffee is another one.  It has gone from being the health demon to the health savior so many times that you probably couldn’t get through your cup with a good feeling about it.  One enemy of the heart has remained steadfast though.  Salt has gained the evil reputation as the ultimate heart killer.  However, new studies being released have the American Heart Association on edge because they now question the science behind limiting salt to minuscule levels.

The danger here is that there are plenty of Americans that outright struggle day to day to try to reduce salt to the government’s guideline of 2300 milligrams or the AHA’s even stricter guideline of just 1500.  The AHA is concerned that the average American working on cutting salt might see a study like this and throw their hands up and say whatever.

It makes sense, in a way.  Like the above examples.  You like eggs, they tell you to stop eating eggs.  You cut it out or down, and then they tell you it was good for you.  Then a new study tells you you’re screwed.  A lot of people kind of reasoned that out to, hey, I’ll eat some eggs if I want to.  The evidence against the eggs was not unanimous or damning enough to go to great extents to cut them out if you like having them around.  Same with coffee.  For every article out there suggesting you cut it out completely, there’s another one saying that drinking seven cups a day or more will save your liver.  Most people shoot for the middle.  Maybe I won’t drink eight cups today, but I might have two or three and not worry about it.

The problem is that taking this perfectly reasonable approach with salt is dangerous.  Salt is the enemy.  This study needs to be taken with…we apologize for this one in advance…a grain of salt.  The study doesn’t mean that everything you ever heard about salt in too high of a quantity being bad for you is junk science nonsense.  It means that you do need salt, and cutting it down to ridiculously low levels can actually go back the other way, threatening your health in totally different ways.  So, the people that need to take notice of this latest information is those that went too hardcore on their salt conversation.  You need to get that 1500, or even the 2300.  You just don’t need to get more than that.

So, don’t throw your hands up and surrender and ask for the salt shaker.  It’s a good fight, but you might be fighting it too hard.  Don’t overdo the not doing.  Allow yourself the salt you need, and try to control it from there.  The real war on salt has been misunderstood in America for years; people think that this means don’t put salt on your food.  Well, that is good advice, but the salt you add to your fast food fries is bad, but leaving it out doesn’t mean you are that much more salt free.  The fry itself is already packed with tons of sodium before you ever thought about adding to it.  Not to mention the burger you had with it.  Not to mention the apple pie.  Say you stopped by a sandwich joint for a lighter, healthier lunch.  Unfortunately, even processed meat is chock full of salt.  Salt-wise, a sandwich can be worse than a meal you might consider to be the devil itself.  The real danger to people everywhere is the salt that is not in-your-face obvious.

So, don’t overdo it.  Don’t underdo it.  Try to stay within the lines.

Here’s another thing to consider if you are watching your salt intake.  While both the AHA and the FDA have daily guidelines, your body doesn’t shut off at a particular time.  These deadlines are more for us have something to try to gauge it by.  This means that having a salt-fest on Tuesday and then having the daily guideline on Wednesday still means you are way over on salt in general.  The daily guideline is a good way to look at it, but sometimes it can be easier to manage if you also look at it from a weekly standpoint as well.  Budget it like your checkbook.  Maybe you really eat light on the salt during the week because you know you want that one salt-bomb when you go out to dinner on Friday or Saturday night.  It’s not all about one day, because if you look at it that way, you’ll consume 4,000 mg one day and 2250 the next, and be patting yourself on the back.  Like most things in life, you have to try to find the balance and realize that you aren’t going to hit that figure every day, so you might want to try to have a sense of making up for things and budgeting to try to keep it somewhat in balance long term.  After all, it is the long term, and not what you do today or this week, that will determine the toll that excessive salt intake has on your heart.

If you’re interested in this sort of thing, Common Sense Conspiracy has addressed salt in our articles before.  Check out Are We Programmed to Think that Salt Tastes Good?

It's not just about the shaker anymore.  Salt is creeping up on you at every turn.

It’s not just about the shaker anymore. Salt is creeping up on you at every turn.

Details are sketchy right now, but apparently more than one gunman unloaded on a Mother’s Day Parade in New Orleans today.  At least seventeen people have been confirmed to be wounded; fortunately none of the injuries are life-threatening, according to police sources.  It seems that this is a completely random shooting, and the police have not announced any suspects at this time, although they have promised “swift arrests” in the matter.

130512162812-new-orleans-shooting-02-story-topShooting events like these are more troubling when they seem to have no intended purpose except to strike fear in the hearts of people trying to enjoy a nice day in a nice city.  No, there is not a shooting that is a good situation, of course, but it is a little more comforting when there is some sort of motivation that you can wrap your mind around.  Like if the gunmen were trying to kill a specific person or persons and someone else accidentally got caught in the crossfire.  It doesn’t make the situation better per se, but at least you have some reasoning behind why and how that could happen.  It’s obvious by the number wounded as well as the fact that no one was killed that this was just one or more people with weapons spraying a crowd.  They probably were indifferent to who got hurt or killed, and might even be disappointed wherever they are now to find out that everyone survived.

Most likely this is not the work of an international-type terrorist, but what is the difference really?  It’s still terrorism; it still seeks to make people frightened to go about their normal activities.

As more information becomes available, we will be trying to ascertain if there are any inconsistencies in the official story and anything that might indicate that this is another potential false-flag situation to ramp up public support for gun control.  We’ll keep you posted.

The West, Texas fertilizer blast came in the midst of one crazy week in America.  It happened in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings and the ensuing manhunt for the suspects.  So, what would have remained a first-cycle news story around the clock kind of got swept under the rug, and to a lot of Americans, right or wrong, it became an afterthought.  An unfortunate accident, and certainly a tragedy, but there was no reason to think that this was another act of terror or anything like that.  This just happens, and there was tons of information coming out after the blast about how the company had some issues with monitoring safety guidelines regarding the potentially explosive chemicals that are used there on a daily basis.  However, sometimes information comes out that just insults the general public’s intelligence, and we at Common Sense Conspiracy think this is one of those times.

We shunned the hardcore conspiracy theories, including the silly video that tried to say a missile hit the fertilizer plant just before the blast.  But last week, authorities announced that a criminal investigation of the incident was underway.  This still didn’t put it back on the major cycle.  Now, today’s latest news is the craziest thing we’ve heard yet, and it’s time for people to start waking up to the fact that there is more to the Texas fertilizer explosion than we are being told.

You got some explaining to do, my friend.

You got some explaining to do, my friend.

Meet Bryce Reed, a 31-year-old paramedic who was a first responder to the explosion scene.  We are now hearing that he has been charged by authorities with possessing a pipe bomb.  Not suspected, not maybe… he was arrested, booked, and will face these charges.  However, his and the “official” story is that the charges have nothing to do with the blast.  He just happened to have a pipe bomb at his home, and the federales just happened to search his home (not because of the explosion investigation or anything) and now he just happens to be facing a very serious charge that even if he is found innocent of, will completely ruin his life going forward.

Do you have a pipe bomb in your home?  I don’t.  You know who did?  The Tsarnaev brothers.  They had a pipe bomb.  They had multiple pipe bombs.  Is it normal to have a pipe bomb in your home?  No, it’s not!  There, we said it.  And if you do have a pipe bomb in your home and you just so happened to be a first responder at the scene of a cataclysmic explosion at a fertilizer plant, you can’t tell me that there is no connection at all between those two events.

A paramedic.  The last person you would suspect.  A first responder.  Maybe it was really easy to be a first responder for Bryce Reed, since he might have already been on the scene when distress calls went out.  And never mind the fact that he has been on “administrative leave” ever since.  Of course, no one wants to tell us why that is.

The good news is that Bryce Reed is in custody tonight and off the streets of West, Texas.  Because I really don’t care if he caused the Texas fertilizer plant to explode or not… if you have a pipe bomb in your home, I don’t want you on the streets.  Period.

More people died in this explosion, but it just doesn't have the sensationalism required to have the full attention of the mainstream media.

More people died in this explosion, but it just doesn’t have the sensationalism required to have the full attention of the mainstream media.

Really, can you come up with one realistic, reasonable reason to have a pipe bomb in your home?  Or anywhere that you have access to?

Let me guess, Bryce?  You were using the bomb to practice your paramedic skills in case of a real blast?

Something stinks here big time, and the fact that authorities continue to parade around as if we should all just turn the other cheek and go on about our business is an insult to our intelligence.  The Boston bombings were a terrible, atrocious act of terror, but in terms of property damage, the potential act here could be ridiculous.  Why is there not more outcry?

For the last times, pipe bombs BAD.  Good, normal people in America don’t have pipe bombs.  What are the odds that this fellow has a pipe bomb, is a first responder on that scene, and had nothing to do with it?

Statistics, anyone?